Summary:
As a scholar of constitutional law, Obama brings a unique perspective to the recent debate surrounding the correct approach to interpreting and applying the tenets of the Constitution. He frames his discussion of the Constitution with an account of his first weeks as a senator in Washington, during which time he became acquainted with many of the old-guard lawmakers who, he found, displayed a reverence for the Constitution that was often unmatched in their younger counterparts. One particularly troubling manifestation of this irreverence was the debate over the filibustering of President Bush’s judicial nominees, which Obama regarded as a low point in recent Congressional history. He positions himself as a lawmaker who recognizes the historical significance of the Constitution, but who feels it is a living document that must be applied flexibly in order to remain relevant in an ever-changing world.. (Source: Wikipedia: The Audacity of Hope)

Quotes or Topics from Chapter that are Compeling:

"(In regards to Living Document or Strictly Interpreted) The answer I settle on--which is by no means original to me--requires a shift in metaphors, one that see our democracy not as a house to be built, but as a conversation to be had." (p 92)

"What the framework of our Constitution can do is organize the by which we argue about our future." (p 92)

Questions to Think About:
1. What do you see as the role of the constitution? Is it a living evolving document or be strictly interpreted? (Question Discussion)


2. question text? (Question Discussion)


3. question text? (Question Discussion)


4. quuestion text (Question Discussion)


Call to Action Idea for Obama, Minnesota, Yourself
1. Actually read the constitution.

References:


External Links:
Wikipedia US Constitution Summary
Wiki Source - Constitution of the United States of America Actual Text